Evidence, dates, boundaries, and corrections.
How Onira researches and maintains editorial guides, competitor comparisons, production evidence, product claims, and machine-readable versions. Effective July 11, 2026.
Purpose
Useful production knowledge before product promotion.
Onira publishes guides, comparisons, production essays, checklists, and film evidence for documentary creators. The editorial goal is to help a reader make a production or buying decision even when Onira is not the right tool.
Content is not commissioned to create artificial page volume. Every indexable page should answer a distinct intent, disclose important boundaries, connect to relevant evidence, and remain worth maintaining as products and policies change.
Authorship
Organizational bylines are used when no individual author is publicly accountable.
- Onira Editorial
- Used for maintained guides, checklists, comparison research, and product-boundary content reviewed as an organizational publication.
- Named authors
- Used only when a real person agrees to a public byline and can be associated with the article. Names and biographies are never invented for authority signals.
- Customer evidence
- Customer names, logos, quotations, outcomes, and publications require permission and a retained evidence record.
- Community evidence
- First-party films are not described as community or independent-creator work unless an external creator actually made and authorized that claim.
Research
Primary and official sources lead time-sensitive claims.
- Product comparisons
- Use current official pricing, product, documentation, help, policy, and release pages. State the review date and distinguish editorial research from hands-on testing.
- Platform policy
- Link directly to current YouTube or other platform policy rather than relying on a vendor summary.
- Technical guidance
- Prefer official model documentation, research papers, standards, archives, and authoritative institutional sources.
- Onira claims
- Trace plans, models, product behavior, duration limits, billing, privacy, and workflow statements to current code, deployed behavior, Terms, or measured evidence.
A source list does not prove that every sentence is correct. Readers and creators should still verify high-stakes or publication-sensitive claims in context.
Comparisons
Compare the production job, not a cherry-picked feature list.
Onira comparisons are written from official public information unless a page explicitly describes a dated hands-on benchmark. They should explain which buyer and workflow each product serves, including cases where the competitor is the better choice.
Pricing, model catalogs, credits, limits, and publishing features change quickly. Every comparison carries a review date and official source links. A winner claim requires a disclosed method, equivalent inputs, complete outputs, human effort, cost, correction, and an acceptance standard.
- No invented limitations
- Unknown behavior is labeled unknown or sent back to the vendor source for confirmation.
- No fake testing
- Editorial review is not described as hands-on use, blind evaluation, or a laboratory benchmark.
- No universal winner
- Recommendations are tied to a production job, operator, risk tolerance, and desired output.
- Refresh trigger
- Material pricing, product, policy, ownership, or workflow changes require review before the page is promoted again.
AI assistance
AI can assist drafting; accountability remains human and organizational.
Onira may use language models to outline, summarize source material, identify gaps, edit prose, translate positioning, or help test structured content. AI output is not treated as a source.
Public content must be reviewed for unsupported claims, source accuracy, product truth, competitor fairness, duplicated language, legal risk, and whether it serves the intended reader. Generated quotes, testimonials, results, author identities, or customer stories are prohibited.
Updates and corrections
Material changes are dated; material errors are corrected.
- Published date
- When the page first entered the public editorial corpus.
- Updated or reviewed date
- When claims, sources, product behavior, policy, or material guidance were last checked.
- Correction
- A factual error that changes reader understanding should be fixed promptly. Significant corrections should be noted in the article or changelog when context matters.
- Removal
- A page may be redirected or removed when it becomes thin, misleading, duplicative, impossible to maintain, or outside Onira's real market.
Send corrections with the page URL, disputed statement, and supporting source to hello@onira.studio.
Search and LLM discovery
Machine-readable access mirrors the human page; it does not replace it.
- Canonical HTML
- The human-readable page is the canonical publication and carries metadata, structured data, dates, visible sources, and internal links.
- Markdown alternate
- Eligible guides, comparisons, and articles advertise a full text/markdown mirror for assistants and text-oriented crawlers.
- LLM indexes
- llms.txt and llms-full.txt describe the product, constraints, routes, and maintained editorial corpus without hidden promises.
- Crawler access
- Robots directives allow major search and answer-engine crawlers. Inclusion, citation, or ranking is never guaranteed.
Found something materially wrong?
Send the page URL, disputed statement, and the strongest supporting source. Corrections are reviewed against the current product or primary evidence.